Go to PSANZ Homepage
Home
Search
  • About
    • Our People
    • Goals & Strategies
    • Contact Us
  • IMPACT Research
    • IMPACT Network Trials
    • IMPACT Network Trial Endorsement
  • Resources for Researchers
    • Trial Setup
      • Working With Parents
      • Developing A Research Question
      • Good Clinical Practice
      • Trial Registration
      • Trial Committees
      • Funding
      • Ethics & Governance
    • Running A Trial
      • How To Randomise
      • Randomisation Services
      • Data Monitoring Committees
      • Statistical Approaches To Data Monitoring
    • Trial Completion
      • Follow-up
      • Data
      • IPD
      • Cochrane Reviews
  • Clinical Trials
    • Clinical Trials Database
  • Meetings and Events
    • IMPACT Meetings
    • IMPACT Past Meetings
    • Collaborators Meetings
  • Collaborators
    • IMPACT Collaborators
  • Support
    • Useful Links
    • Trial Resources
    • Contact Us
  • Find us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
Go to PSANZ Homepage

MBM Trial Information

MBM Trial Information Participant Information Recruitment Participating Hospitals Documents

Objective

Stillbirth directly affects over 2,700 families in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) each year and is associated with devastating and long-lasting psychosocial impact. Stillbirth rates have shown little improvement for over two decades. Maternal reporting of decreased fetal movements (DFM), the most frequent cause for unscheduled antenatal visits, is strongly associated with an increased risk of stillbirths. Maternal perception of DFM has been proposed as a simple, inexpensive screening tool for stillbirth. However women’s awareness of the importance of DFM and/or delay in seeking health care is suboptimal. The Lancet’s Stillbirth Series included DFM in the top 10 research priorities for stillbirth prevention, and preliminary data suggests that interventions to increase maternal awareness of DFM, including the option of counting fetal movements, reduces delays in women reporting to health care facilities and stillbirth rates. Robust evidence is needed to assess the benefits and potential harms, including unnecessary intervention and negative psychosocial impact.
The objective of the MBM trial is evaluate the effectiveness of the MBM package of interventions on stillbirth at 28 weeks or more, across maternity facilities in Australia and New Zealand.

Study Design

A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

Study Population

Women with a singleton pregnancy attending for antenatal care; and midwives and doctors providing maternity care at the participating hospitals.

Intervention

Maternity hospitals rather than individual patients will be randomised in a stepped design to sequentially introduce the intervention. The intervention includes the MBM package of interventions consisting of (1) a mobile phone software program designed to increase maternal awareness of fetal movements and reduce delay in reporting of DFM, and (2) an education program for clinicians around the use of MBM and best-practice management of women reporting DFM.

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: Stillbirth at 28 weeks or more gestation.
Secondary outcomes: a) composite measure of adverse neonatal outcomes; b) health service utilisation measures; and c) woman’s psychosocial outcomes and health seeking behaviour and acceptability.

Data/Power Analysis

The study will include 27 hospitals in ANZ with an average of 3,170 singleton births per year (range: 1400, 7000) giving 256,700 total births over 3 years. The current stillbirth rate >28weeks is 3 per 1000. We therefore would expect (without the MBM package to raise maternal awareness and early reporting of DFM) 770 stillbirths (>28weeks), with 10% due to major congenital abnormalities where the intervention is unlikely to have an effect, leaving 693 stillbirths. MBM is hypothesised to reduce the rate to 2 per 1000.
Statistical power assumptions: significance level of 5%; analysis by generalised linear mixed model; births equally distributed across hospital groupings; baseline stillbirth rate 0.3%; intervention stillbirth rate: 0.2%; intra-class correlation (ICC)=0.005.
We propose sequential introduction of the intervention into 8 groups of 3-4 hospitals at four month intervals; over a total of three years. This will give 89% power to detect a 30% relative risk reduction in stillbirth rates (from 3/1000 to 2/1000), 85% power to detect a 25% reduction, and 80% power to for a 15% reduction. The trial methods have been harmonised with that of a trial in Scotland (led by Jane Norman) (330,000 births over 3 years). Combining data from the two trials (786,700 births), would give 89% power to detect a 10% decrease in stillbirth rates.

Commencement Date

8 August 2016

Investigators and Primary Contacts

Lead investigators: Vicki Flenady; Glenn Gardener; Philippa Middleton; Michael Coory; David Ellwood; Caroline Crowther; Christine East; Emily Callander; Jane Norman; Frances Boyle; Frederik Froen, Victoria Bowring; and Susan Vlack

Associate investigators: Adrian Charles; Adrienne Gordon; Alison Kent; Belinda Jennings; Deborah Schofield; Glyn Teale; Jonathan Morris; and Kassam Mahomed.

Contact: MBM trial coordinator, mbmtrial@mater.uq.edu.au

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Trial Registry Number

ACTRN12614000291684

  • Find us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
Visit the PSANZ Main Website
PSANZ

Suite J, Building 3, 19 Bruce Street, Mornington, Victoria, Australia 3931
Tel: 1300 867 224 (Australia) 
Tel: +61 3835 24221 (overseas)
admin@psanz.com.au

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • © PSANZ
Website designed at The Fount